Comparison · Updated

Kiro vs Cursor: specs, pricing, models and which AI IDE to pick

KiroSpec-driven AI IDE · AWS
CursorAI code editor · sold with The X Subscription

Short answer

Pick Kiro if you want specs before code: AWS built it around requirements, a design and a task list that you review before the agent implements anything, and its free plan has 50 credits a month. Pick Cursor if you want a faster, chat-first editor with its own models, cloud agents and event-driven Automations, and a cheaper first paid plan ($8 a month against Kiro's $20). Both import a VS Code setup and install extensions from Open VSX.

Kiro vs Cursor at a glance

KiroCursor
What it isAI IDE from AWS built around specs, with a CLI, a web agent and Kiro CrewAI code editor with its own agent, CLI and cloud agents
Price to startFree with 50 credits a month; Pro is $20 a monthFree with limited requests; Plus is $8 a month
How use is countedCredits: 1,000 on Pro up to 10,000 on Power; extra at $0.04 eachA weekly pool for Cursor's models; third-party models per token
ModelsAuto, Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5, GPT-5.6, and open-weight models such as DeepSeek and QwenGrok 4.7 and Composer 2.5 from the plan's weekly pool; Claude, GPT, Gemini and others at API list price on Premium and up
PlanningSpecs: requirements.md, design.md and tasks.md, plus bugfix specsPlanning in the agent; Projects for longer work
Project rulesSteeringRules
Hooks.kiro/hooks/*.json, with triggers such as PostFileSave and PreToolUse; a command or a prompt to the agent21 events in hooks.json; command or prompt handlers; no permission-request event
Skills and MCPAgent Skills, MCP, and PowersSkills, MCP, subagents, plugins
Unattended workWeb agent with an autonomous mode; Kiro CrewCloud agents and Automations on Premium ($30) and up
Editor baseBuilt on VS Code's open source foundation; Open VSX extensionsImports VS Code settings and extensions; Open VSX extensions
Where it runsIDE, CLI, web, mobile (early access), Kiro CrewDesktop editor, CLI (agent), cloud agents, mobile, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Linear, Jira

Pricing

Kiro

  • Free$050 credits a month; open-weight models and Claude Sonnet 4.5.
  • Pro$20/mo1,000 credits; premium models; extra credits at $0.04 each.
  • Pro+$40/mo2,000 credits.
  • Pro Max$100/mo5,000 credits.
  • Power$200/mo10,000 credits.
  • Teams$20 per seat/mo500 credits per seat, pooled from 2 seats; extra credits at $0.04.

Checked Nov 11, 2026 on kiro.dev

Cursor

  • Free$0Limited agent and chat requests.
  • Plus$8/moGrok models only, from a weekly usage pool shared with Grok.
  • Premium$30/mo4x Plus usage; cloud agents and Automations; third-party models at API list price.
  • Super$100/mo15x Plus usage; priority at peak times.
  • Ultra$200/mo50x Plus usage.
  • TeamsFrom $30 per user/moCentral billing, SSO, shared rules, skills and plugins.

Checked Nov 11, 2026 on cursor.com

Kiro sells credits, and each model uses them at its own rate: Auto counts 1x, Claude Sonnet 5.5 1.3x and Claude Opus 5.5 2x. Cursor's own models come out of a weekly pool with no per-token bill, and other vendors' models are billed at API list price from Premium up. If you want Claude models in the IDE, Kiro includes them from the $20 plan; in Cursor they start at $30 plus tokens.

Specs first, or chat first

This is the real difference.

Kiro makes the spec the center of the work. You describe a feature and Kiro writes three files: requirements.md with user stories and acceptance criteria, design.md with the architecture, and tasks.md with a list of discrete tasks. You review them before it implements anything. For a bug there is a bugfix spec, which records the current, expected and unchanged behavior. When you run all tasks, Kiro orders them by dependency and runs them in waves, with the tasks inside a wave in parallel. A Quick Spec writes all three files without stopping for approval, for work you already understand.

Cursor starts from the prompt. You ask for a change, watch the diff and correct course. There is planning in the agent and Projects for longer work, but nothing forces a written spec. That is faster for small changes and gives you less of a paper trail for big ones.

If your team reviews designs before code, Kiro builds that in. If you mostly want the agent to get on with it, Cursor is lighter.

Credits against a weekly pool

Kiro sells credits. The free plan has 50 a month. Pro has 1,000 for $20, Pro+ 2,000 for $40, Pro Max 5,000 for $100 and Power 10,000 for $200, and paid plans buy more at $0.04 each. Models use credits at different rates: Auto is 1x, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 1.3x, Claude Opus 5.5 is 2x and the open-weight models are well under 1x.

Cursor's paid plans share a weekly pool for its own models, Grok 4.7 and Composer 2.5: Plus at $8, then Premium at $30 with four times the pool, Super at $100 with 15 times and Ultra at $200 with 50 times. Other vendors' models start at Premium and are billed at API list price.

Models

Kiro's model list has Auto, which routes each task to a model, Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra and Luna, and open-weight models such as DeepSeek 3.2, GLM-5 and Qwen3 Coder Next. The free plan gets Auto, Claude Sonnet 4.5 and the open-weight models. Some models are limited to US regions.

Cursor has its own Grok and Composer models, and from Premium also Claude, GPT, Gemini and others.

Hooks, steering and unattended work

  • Hooks: Kiro hooks are JSON files in .kiro/hooks/. Triggers include PostFileSave, PreToolUse, PostToolUse and Stop, and the action is a shell command or a prompt to the agent, such as "update the tests for this file". They work in the IDE and the CLI. Cursor's hooks.json has 21 events, with command or prompt handlers.
  • Project rules: Kiro calls them steering; Cursor calls them rules.
  • Skills and MCP: both read Agent Skills and connect MCP servers. Kiro adds Powers.
  • Away from your desk: Kiro has a web agent with an autonomous mode, and Kiro Crew. Cursor has cloud agents, and Automations that start one on a cron schedule or on events from GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Sentry, PagerDuty or a webhook.

The editor underneath

Kiro says it is built on Visual Studio Code's open source foundation, and it imports a VS Code profile: extensions, themes, settings and shortcuts. Cursor imports VS Code settings, keybindings and extensions in one click. Both use the Open VSX registry, so an extension that exists only in Microsoft's Marketplace may be missing from either.

Which to pick

Pick Kiro if

  • Your team wants requirements and a design reviewed before any code is written.
  • You want Claude models included from a $20 plan.
  • You want a free plan that includes Claude Sonnet 4.5.
  • You want hooks that react to a file being saved.

Pick Cursor if

  • You want to prompt, watch the diff and iterate quickly.
  • You want the cheapest paid plan: $8 a month.
  • You want agents that start on events from GitHub, Slack, Linear or Sentry.
  • You want Grok, Claude, GPT and Gemini in one editor.

Also consider

Questions

Is Kiro free?

Kiro has a free plan with 50 credits a month and access to open-weight models and Claude Sonnet 4.5. Paid plans start with Pro at $20 a month for 1,000 credits, as of November 2026.

Do I need an AWS account to use Kiro?

Kiro is built and run by AWS, but you sign in to it as its own product. Check kiro.dev for the sign-in options that apply to you.

What is spec-driven development in Kiro?

Kiro turns a prompt into a spec of three files: requirements.md (or bugfix.md for a bug), design.md and tasks.md. You review them, then Kiro runs the tasks one at a time or all at once, in waves that respect each task's dependencies.

Which is cheaper, Kiro or Cursor?

Cursor's first paid plan is cheaper: Plus is $8 a month with Cursor's own Grok models. Kiro Pro is $20 a month for 1,000 credits, which cover Claude and GPT models at different rates per model. Cursor offers those vendors' models from Premium, $30 a month, plus tokens.

Can I use my VS Code extensions in Kiro and Cursor?

Mostly. Both import a VS Code setup and both install extensions from the Open VSX registry, so extensions that are only in Microsoft's Marketplace may be missing.

More comparisons

All comparisons

Know when your agents need you

Briefkin puts your Claude Code, Codex and Cursor sessions on one board: working, needs you, done or failed. Telegram pings you when one is waiting on you, and scheduled skills post their reports next to them.

Free during the open beta. No card.